Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  81 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 81 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

81

11–14 APRIL, 2018, HELSINKI, FINLAND

S9: GENITALIA 1

Moderators: Katja P. Wolffenbuttel (Netherlands), Marco Castagnetti (Italy)

ESPU Meeting on Thursday 12, April 2018, 14:00–14:38

14:00–14:05

S9-1 (LO)

SCROTAL VERSUS INGUINAL ORCHIDOPEXY IMPACT

ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND COMPLICATIONS:

A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Luis H BRAGA 

1

, Melissa MCGRATH 

2

, Bethany EASTERBROOK 

2

,

Kizanee JEGATHEESWARAN 

2

, Natasha BROWNRIGG 

3

, Jorge DEMARIA 

4

and

Armando J LORENZO 

5

1) McMaster University - McMaster Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery / Urology, Hamilton, CANADA -

2) McMaster University, McMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, Hamilton, CANADA - 3) McMaster

University - McMaster Children's Hospital, Paediatrics, Hamilton, CANADA - 4) McMaster University - McMaster

Children's Hospital, Surgery, Hamilton, CANADA - 5) University of Toronto, Surgery, Toronto, CANADA

PURPOSE

To compare scrotal (SO) vs. inguinal orchidopexy (IO) impact on analgesic use, postoperative pain

scores and complication rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

AsuperiorityRCT including boys 10–95 months of age at surgery, diagnosed with palpable UDT was

conducted. Patients with non-palpable or bilateral testes, previous orchidopexies and concurrent

procedures were excluded. Block randomization with 1:1 allocation ratio to IO or SO was utilized,

as was a standardized anesthesia protocol with peri/post-operative analgesia. Primary outcome:

postoperative pain and analgesic use in hospital(FLACC/CHEOPS) and at home(PPPM/TPPS)

using validated pain scales. A 2-point difference in the pain scale was considered as minimally

important difference. Secondary outcomes: operative time (OpT), conversion and success rates,

and complications assessed at 6–8-week F/U.

RESULTS

Of 1093 screened patients, 154(14 %) were eligible and 112(72 %) recruited. Of the 99 boys who

completed F/U, 50 had IO and 49 SO. Baseline demographics are presented in table 1.

Characteristics

Inguinal n=50(%)

Scrotal n=49(%)

Median age at surgery (IQR)

22(IQR:13-64)

26(IQR:14-64)

Mean weight (kilograms±SD)

15±6.5

16±6.1

Location of testis

Canalicular

Above external inguinal ring

Below external inguinal ring

Pre-scrotal

17(34)

23(46)

10(20)

0(0)

15(31)

18(37)

14(28)

2(4)