Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  172 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 172 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

172

29

th

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

S23: ENDOUROLOGY

Moderators: Anna Bujons (Spain), Rosa Romero (Spain)

ESPU Meeting on Saturday 14, April 2018, 11:06–11:44

11:06–11:11

S23-1 (LO)

MINI-PERC FOR RENAL CALCULI IN PEDIATRIC

PATIENTS: DOES SIZE MATTER?

M S ANSARI and Aneesh SRIVASTAV

Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology and renal

transplantation, Lucknow, INDIA

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, efficacy, and stone-free rate (SFR) of Min-perc nephrolithotomy (m-PCNL)

and compare it with conventional PCNL (cPCNL) for the management of renal calculi in pediatric

patients under 18 years of age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

50 patients with renal calculi were randomly divided into two groups in prospective manner, mPCNL:

were managed by mini-Perc (size15 Fr.) and conventional PCNL (cPCNL) (size 24 Fr.). The mean

age, sex, stone burden, operating time, complications (haematuria, drop in hematocrit), pain score

(lumbar pain), need of analgesia, perinephric extravasation, nephrostomy site leak, hospital stay,

and stone free rate (SFR) were compared between the two groups. The success of the procedure

was defined as the absence of residual stones or small residuals of 3

mm on ultrasonography or

X ray KUB at 12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Both the groups were comparable for preoperative parameters. The mean stone size was

1.9 (10.75–35.25) mm and the mean number of stones was 2 (1–5). The mean (SD) operating

time was statistically significantly longer in m-PCNL [90+ 25 min] as compared to cPCNL 70.2±20,

p=0.04]. On first session of PCNL the SFR for m-PCNL was 94.2 % and for cPCNL 93.31 %, which

was not significantly different (P = 0.060). On re-look SFR improved to 97.3 % and 96.2 % respec-

tively. Episodes of haematuria and drop in hematocrit was more in cPCNL as compared to mPCNL

[p=0.03.]. Likewise, pain score, need of analgesia, perinephric extravasation and nephrostomy site

leak was higher in cPCNL as compared to mPCNL [p=0.02]. Although the hospital stay was longer

in cPCNL as compared to mPCNL this was not statistically significant (P = 0.244).

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-Perc offers good outcomes with lower complications rates compared to the conventional tech-

nique. The size of tract influences the nature of complications such as higher haematuria, lumbar

pain and renal extravasation.