Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  114 / 238 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 114 / 238 Next Page
Page Background

114

29

th

CONGRESS OF THE ESPU

S14: LAPAROSCOPY / ROBOTICS

Moderators: Rafal Chrzan (Poland), Aseem Shukla (USA)

ESPU Meeting on Friday 13, April 2018, 08:52–09:46

08:52–08:55

S14-1 (PP)

FEASIBILITY AND BENEFITS OF THE RETROPERITONEAL

LAPAROSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF URETEROPELVIC

JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION IN CHILDREN UNDER ONE

YEAR, COMPARED TO OPEN SURGERY

Anthony KALLAS-CHEMALY, Matthieu PEYCELON, Liza ALI, Christine GRAPIN-

DAGORNO, Elisabeth CARRICABURU, Pascale PHILIPPE-CHOMETTE, Goharig

ENEZIAN, Annabel PAYE-JAOUEN and Alaa EL-GHONEIMI

Robert-Debré University Hospital, AP-HP; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paediatric Urology, National

reference center of rare urinary tract malformations (MARVU), Paris, FRANCE

PURPOSE

The advantage and feasibility of laparoscopy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

(UJPO) remains controversial in children under twelve months of age. The aim of this study was to

evaluate the feasibility and benefits of retroperitoneal laparoscopy (RL) in this age group, compared

to open surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2012, the choice of the approach for children less than twelve months of age was decided

according to the laparoscopic experience of the surgeon; two surgeons operated by RL, 3 tro-

cars standardized technique (5, 3, 3 mm) while others operated them by dorsal lumbotomy (DL).

Analgesics and criteria for discharge were conducted according to pre-established protocol. Intra-

and postoperative parameters have been analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

During 5-year period, 24 RL (mean age 7 months: 1,5–11) 55 DL (5,2 months: 2–11), were in-

cluded with a mean follow-up of 27 months (5–63). Postoperative drainage was performed by

double-J stent in 13 (RL) and 5 patients (DL) or external stent in 11(RL) and 50 patients (DL).

There was no conversion in RL. Hospital stay and IV analgesics duration were significantly lower in

the RL group (2.83 days vs 2.35 days, p=0.02 respectively) while operative time was significantly

longer (163.05 min vs 85.76 min, p=0.001). A redo surgery was needed for one patient in each

group (UPJ stenosis).

34 % of DL 12 % of RL patients were operated by the fellow assisted by the senior staff.

CONCLUSIONS

Although, RL remains challenging in infants with longer operative time, it is feasible without added

morbidity compared to open surgery. The hospital stay and analgesic requirements are less. Some

drawbacks still need to improve: higher use of double J stent and the lower number of patients done

by fellows of pediatric urology.